MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 04:46
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 703
72% 579 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 73.1
62% 75.4 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 67.9
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 82 121 70 89 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 343
Write 46.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 92.3
26% 122 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 20.9
86% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 34.2
62% 123 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
481GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 162
Write 161
Mixed 111
SusWrite 129
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBR2 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 33.1
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 28
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 2,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback