Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 04:43
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 873
82% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,318
82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 176
Reflection 180
Parallax 163
143% 173 fps
Gravity 151
Splatting 117
116% 134 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 310 309 305 303 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 316
Mixed 298
SusWrite 306
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 36.7
148% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 242
192% 268 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 193 190 188 188 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 152
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 190
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Mass Storage Device 128GB
46GB free, PID 1211
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 20.1
27% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.4
230% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$34
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 34.4
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 41.1
SC Mixed 31.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $656
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback