User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
Systemempty empty
MotherboardTYAN S8236
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 02:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6174
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 64.5
42% 60 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 258
23% 194 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 122 121 123 121 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.2% Average
Read 184
Write 184
Mixed 154
SusWrite 121
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 26.9
91% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 32.6
30% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 98%
AMD 2X2 Raid10 1TB
842GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 244 244 240 244 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 19.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 242
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1
242% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback