Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 15:37
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 116
2-Core 217
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 463
62% 463 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 7.78
6% 9.16 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.87
Splatting 16.4
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
565GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 139 140 144 143 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 141
Write 82.7
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 142
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
0GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 142
Write 121
Mixed 19.3
107% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 53%
Generic External 500GB
152GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 1.2 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Read 37.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 0.9
9% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 CT8G4DFS824A.M8FB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback