Asrock H270M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H270M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170418
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '18 at 09:34
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 418 59% 433 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Lighting 76.2 Reflection 74.8 Parallax 71.5 62% 74.2 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 68 Splatting 67.1 56% 68 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 135 124 136 141 146 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 171 Mixed 109 SusWrite 135 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 41 42 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 39.5 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 40.3 28% 38 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 13 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H270M Pro4 Builds (Compare 346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270M Pro4

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	67x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	58x
Core i5-7400Intel $87Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	39x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	8x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 1,560 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16