Dell XPS 8930

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8930  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0DF42J
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180720
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 24 '18 at 04:05
Run Duration316 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 271
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 734
80% 635 Pts
64-Core 965
60% 965 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Dell(1028 3512) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 36.4
31% 34.7 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 34.8
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 292 94 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 465
Write 380
Mixed 332
SusWrite 175
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 34.7
142% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 194
176% 266 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OAD30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 186 187 184 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 187
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 186
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 72.2
103% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA 2TB
222GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 74 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 91.1
Write 96.3
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 73.9
102% 77 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 133
Write 108
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 102
135% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
184GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 19 18 19 30 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 57.8
Write 46.2
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 26.2
58% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 62%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
271GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 17 18 17 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 96.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 17.8
73% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-00RWYB1 5TB
82GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 17 18 17 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 98.5
Write 100
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 17.8
95% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 50%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-00RWYB1 5TB
82GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 17 18 17 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
Read 96.8
Write 98.1
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 17.8
95% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 73 72 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 132
Write 140
Mixed 101
SusWrite 73.1
148% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 88.2
Write 101
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 73
114% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 26.9
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8930 Builds (Compare 6,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 8930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback