Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 13 '16 at 08:19
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 186
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 394
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4029
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 16
Parallax 2.44
2% 6.76 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.83
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L2 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 483
Write 68.1
Mixed 101
46% 217 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 13.8
83% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 41.8
DQ Mixed 29.2
67% 148 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
618GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 98.3
Write 94.1
Mixed 68.5
109% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback