Bangho MAX G0101

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBangho MAX G0101  (all builds)
MotherboardBANGHO MAX G0101
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '18 at 12:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 113
55% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 110
20% 142 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5455) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 2.22
1% 1.94 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2.65
2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD mSATA 32GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01MG
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 55.8
Mixed 67
37% 175 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 14.3
74% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 29.7
39% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 49%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
206GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 96 101 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 97.9
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MAGNUMTECH Kingston 9905469-157.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAX G0101 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Bangho MAX G0101

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback