Asus P6T

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P6T (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '18 at 03:22
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	65%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 96.4 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 111 58% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 307 30% 247 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 46.4 Reflection 51 Parallax 60.6 38% 52.7 fps	MRender 49.6 Gravity 37 Splatting 36.6 33% 41.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 215 122 84 134 172 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.8% Above average	Read 259 Write 155 Mixed 243 SusWrite 153 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 17.2 89% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 132 118% 179 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 12TB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 11TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 139 139 150 148 145 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 127 Write 120 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 142 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 120%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 117 124 123 127 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 109 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 121 129% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 191% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 23.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 13.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	571x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	146x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	78x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	64x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	224x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	125x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $318

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16