Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F7
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '18 at 23:02
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 72.7 37% 56.6 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 136 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F846) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 146 125 41 67 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 392 Write 346 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 115 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 28.8 98% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 111 104% 160 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 912GB free Firmware: AX1P4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 109 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 100 Write 101 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 109 63% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB 333 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.2% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	14x
A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 34%, 2,180 samples	8x
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	14x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GBSamsungBench 69%, 476 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
THNSNJ128GVNU 128GBToshibaBench 75%, 310 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16