Lenovo 81FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81FB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 12:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 187
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 525
51% 420 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 21.4
12% 16.9 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 15.6
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Extreme SSD 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 224 212 216 215 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 351
Write 328
Mixed 241
SusWrite 225
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 28.8
93% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 135
103% 140 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 77%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 54 59 57 61 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 99.4
Mixed 83.6
SusWrite 59.3
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 22.2
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FB Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback