Dell OptiPlex 780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 780
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 780  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '18 at 03:11
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 61.7
38% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 116
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8650) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.64
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 35.8
30% 34.1 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 180 180 183 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48% Average
Read 238
Write 210
Mixed 199
SusWrite 178
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 13.4
67% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 24.3
60% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48%
Great: 69%
Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series 240GB-$225
223GB free
Firmware: LT2i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 171 135 132 125 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 205
Write 187
Mixed 200
SusWrite 142
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 25.7
93% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 127
109% 161 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 85%
FUJITSU MHV2060AT PL 60GB
6GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 24
Write 23.3
Mixed 17
SusWrite 25
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 780 Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback