Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DG3/USB3  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '16 at 00:53
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 364
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Lighting 91.1
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 77.6
74% 85.6 fps
MRender 82.6
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 71
63% 77.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.9% Average
Read 265
Write 239
Mixed 250
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 4.1
62% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 25.5
60% 125 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
465GB free
Firmware: 3.AFE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 51.9
Mixed 74
51% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.42
96% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
169GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 47.1
Mixed 69.7
48% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.25
63% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Kingston 9905402-413.A00LF 10GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DG3/USB3 Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DG3/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback