Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 22:30
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 727
76% 608 Pts
64-Core 729
45% 729 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 112
Parallax 94.5
81% 102 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 99
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 803 536 56 91 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1348
Write 931
Mixed 872
SusWrite 406
198% 889 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 77.7
282% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 219
270% 459 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 191%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IR2400D464L15S/8G 075D IR2400D464L15S/4G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 18.4
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback