bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DP55WG
Memory	1.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110630
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '18 at 08:52
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 96.1 53% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 133 23% 160 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 38.4 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 35.6 31% 34.8 fps	MRender 36.1 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 34.2 29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460 240GB-$203 1,730 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 123 113 120 129 125 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 211 Write 202 Mixed 167 SusWrite 119 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 8.3 37% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 138 111% 155 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 185GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 131 132 135 127 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 136 Write 140 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 129 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 25GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 57 57 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 99.2 Write 90.7 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 56 56% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 256GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 58 60 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 66 Write 56 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 58.8 42% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 57%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 230GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 81 82 81 81 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 81.2 Write 68 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 79.7 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 225GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 65 66 64 59 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 56.7 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 62.3 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 83%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 155GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 23 23 23 24 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 18.7 Mixed 20 SusWrite 23.1 30% 22.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 20%
ST350083 0AS 500GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 90GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 21 Mixed 20 SusWrite 22.7 30% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x4B48583136303043313044332F3447202020 0x0198 0x393955353430332D3030332E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x4B48583136303043313044332F3447202020 0x0198 0x393955353430332D3030332E4130304C4620 12GB 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.8% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.8 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,025x
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,569x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	933x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16