Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 03:55
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 214
86% 148 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 575
72% 548 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.2% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 102
Parallax 85.5
76% 93.4 fps
MRender 79.3
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 67.4
62% 77.3 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 460 297 293 295 299 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,716
Write 1,448
Mixed 1,153
SusWrite 460
266% 1,194 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 54.2
165% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 67.2
115% 227 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 163%
Great: 280%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
169GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 133 103 84 82 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 421
Write 394
Mixed 294
SusWrite 143
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 29.5
91% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 85.7
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 77.3
82% 131 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 88%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
882GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 108 99 104 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66% Good
Read 126
Write 82
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 104
60% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66%
Great: 75%
FiiO X3II USB-DISK 64GB
40GB free, PID 0003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 3.8 3.8 3.5 2.9 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Read 6
Write 2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.2
5% 4.18 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.5
72% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 29.2
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 26.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback