Acer Veriton M421G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Veriton M421G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer RS780DV
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091112
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '18 at 03:40
Run Duration	515 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 38.8 2-Core 83.6 42% 64.4 Pts	4-Core 53.2 8-Core 72.3 8% 62.8 Pts	64-Core 79 5% 79 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 014F) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.88 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 1.26 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP1OA3GH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 65.3 Write 78.3 Mixed 39.8 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 13GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,163 Write 12.8 Mixed 27.2 276% 401 MB/s	4K Read 371 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.4 1,445% 124 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 33%
Maxell External USB 3.0 1TB 161 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 3GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1144 Write 8.5 Mixed 9.8 261% 387 MB/s	4K Read 372 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.6 1,405% 124 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler C10 8GB 167 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 1641 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 21.5 Write 5 Mixed 4.2 10% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 6GB free, PID 10a8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 24.3 Write 20.8 Mixed 22 SusWrite 22.1 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 8.1 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 99.5 40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Veriton M421G Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M421G

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 925AMD $150Bench 51%, 5,211 samples	1x
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	2x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GBIntensoBench 74%, 1,366 samples	1x
128GB 128GBIntensoBench 66%, 1,805 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16