Compal PBL1011

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemCompal PBL1011  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal Base Board Product Name
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 03:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 78.7
44% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 75.4
8-Core 78.6
10% 77 Pts
64-Core 77.2
5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Compal(14C0 005A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.88
1% 1.06 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225A7A384 250GB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ESBO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 66 62 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 53.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 64.3
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PBL1011 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compal PBL1011

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback