Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75 Pro3-M (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 22:04
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2020-$92 15,664 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 33.7 1-Core 28.5 2-Core 38.7 22% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 51.5 8-Core 48.6 7% 50 Pts	64-Core 41.4 3% 41.4 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 370 418 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0491) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.65 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 0.74 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 222 Write 122 Mixed 87.7 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 14.1 42% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 50.3 DQ Write 34.9 DQ Mixed 22.7 22% 36 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55 14,577 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 93GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 72.5 Write 35.7 Mixed 37.5 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 4100, Philips USB Flash Drive Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 3.5 6.3 7.8 8.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Read 13.4 Write 7.5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5.3 9% 7.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 9%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 86GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26 Mixed 17.1 22% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF 1x4GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 0.4 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 234 17% 234 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	138x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 51%, 607 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $410

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16