Positivo C14CR01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemPositivo C14CR01  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo C14CR01
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '16 at 04:03
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 127
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2027) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.53
3% 3.71 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 511
Write 338
Mixed 370
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 13.2
77% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 54.3
66% 117 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1333D3S9ELC/4G 0194 SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C14CR01 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo C14CR01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback