Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440x900x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 17:40
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 150 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 390 42% 331 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.5% Below average	Lighting 44.9 Reflection 30 Parallax 55.4 37% 43.4 fps	MRender 28.5 Gravity 44.1 Splatting 37.7 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 73 55 55 31 68 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.1% Average	Read 234 Write 228 Mixed 192 SusWrite 79.8 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 21.4 80% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 98.1 98% 156 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 82%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 465GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 154 148 160 160 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 145 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 155 91% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 0198 99U5402-456.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.3% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	22x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 50%, 173 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16