Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170505
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '18 at 04:21
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 65.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 191 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 584 56% 463 Pts	64-Core 833 52% 833 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.2% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 118 Parallax 0.72 88% 75.3 fps	MRender 80.9 Gravity 107 Splatting 87.1 75% 91.6 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 817 569 561 562 556 552 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	190% Outstanding	Read 1,756 Write 1,455 Mixed 612 SusWrite 603 246% 1,106 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 43.6 157% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 873 DQ Write 702 DQ Mixed 729 562% 768 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 254%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 245GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 372 386 382 376 392 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 382 Write 419 Mixed 298 SusWrite 384 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 81.5 4K Mixed 35.4 125% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 181 158% 229 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 107%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 119GB free Firmware: 0002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 96 93 92 87 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 307 Write 105 Mixed 130 SusWrite 95.5 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 6.8 49% 12.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 62%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 196 196 194 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 160 Mixed 84 SusWrite 194 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 503GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 62 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 99 Write 94.5 Mixed 71 SusWrite 61.2 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.4% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 26 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)