Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 18 '18 at 16:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 450
61% 453 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.10.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18
12% 15.7 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 14
Splatting 18.5
12% 13.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 463 386 290 290 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 473
Mixed 447
SusWrite 361
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 59.1
185% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-027.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback