Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '18 at 12:08
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 600
55% 463 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 97.2
Parallax 91.7
73% 92.7 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 92.9
75% 91.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 314 396 407 408 404 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 391
Write 388
Mixed 277
SusWrite 381
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 17.2
115% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 106
115% 188 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 175 180 181 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 132
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 177
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
18GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 64 69 70 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 64.9
Write 66.4
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 65.7
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
17GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 96 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 74.4
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 97.2
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 112%
MBIL-SSM SWIVEL 2GB
1GB free, PID 0011
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.4 6.2 6.1 2.7 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 4.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.4
9% 7.97 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback