Asrock Z97 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 23:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 438
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Gigabyte(1458 3518) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 0.09
0% 2.09 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 0.09
3% 4.05 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 21 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 14.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 22
10% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 42%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
913GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 107
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
12GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 77 77 77 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 82.3
Write 78.1
Mixed 62
SusWrite 76
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 23.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme4 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback