Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101209
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 55.1 2-Core 110 53% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 319 33% 268 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 49.4 Parallax 54.1 35% 48.9 fps	MRender 50.6 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 36.7 34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 115 111 111 111 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 297 Write 353 Mixed 282 SusWrite 144 61% 269 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 36.7 119% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 34.8 DQ Write 69.8 DQ Mixed 45.1 36% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 124%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 11GB free Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 89 91 101 101 100 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 141 Write 120 Mixed 124 SusWrite 97.4 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 31 116% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 36.1 36% 56 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 400, 400, 400, 400 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.83 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16