Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile M9410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile M9410  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU M118DB
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090123
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 17 '18 at 15:55
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 67.3
39% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 67.6
8-Core 68.8
9% 68.2 Pts
64-Core 69
4% 69 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1142)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056R6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 63 68 61 64 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 202
Write 218
Mixed 176
SusWrite 74.4
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 23.4
58% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 124
98% 137 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38%
Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.5 3.1 2.1 2.9 3.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 8
Mixed 7
SusWrite 2.6
10% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO Mobile M9410 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile M9410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $153
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback