Asrock Z97 Anniversary

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140611
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 23:38
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 408
51% 391 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 89
51% 72.4 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 54.8
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 146
Mixed 171
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 28.1
115% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 143
110% 149 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
42GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 443
Mixed 362
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 54
180% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
312GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 87.5
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
113GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 69.8
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ BK 1.5TB
248GB free
Firmware: 0412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 2.4 2.9 3.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 71.7
Write 6.7
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 3.2
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 071A 1TB
10GB free, PID 071a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 31.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 34.3
42% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Anniversary - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback