Lenovo 20HRCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HRCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HRCTO1WW
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 156
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 227
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 224F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 5.87
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 5.43
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.06 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW1T0HMLH-000L7 1TB
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L7QCXY7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 1140 1025 1176 1169 1141 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,718
Write 1,369
Mixed 891
SusWrite 1,114
285% 1273 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 52.6
182% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 209%
Great: 280%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE304EB-EGCF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20HRCTO1WW Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HRCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback