MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 15:58
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$449
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 267
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 824
77% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 148
Parallax 125
109% 136 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 130
Splatting 104
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1932 1926 1983 1975 1937 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,484
Write 2,105
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 1,948
437% 1,950 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 73.5
250% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,061
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 979
729% 970 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 339%
Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
213GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2147 2215 2215 2211 2205 2205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2539
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 2,200
470% 2,093 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 76.4
259% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,171
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 1,090
820% 1,096 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 365%
Great: 393%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 117 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69% Good
Read 121
Write 99.5
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69%
Great: 112%
Garmin Storage 64GB
59GB free, PID 287c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.4 4.6 6 5.3 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 5.6
10% 8.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
48% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]200[F/T] 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback