Medion P6657 MD99256

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Medion P6657 MD99256 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15DGN
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 07:57
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5200U 107,407 User benchmarks, average bench 42% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 77.3 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 126 58% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 212 28% 213 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 2245) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.32% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 9.92 Parallax 6 4% 7.01 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.32% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3109-S9 534 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 32 13 27 22 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 404 Write 57.4 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 27.6 30% 142 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 7.7 65% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 99.3 DQ Write 33.9 DQ Mixed 6.7 21% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 64%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 607GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 86 86 85 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 82.2 Write 85.3 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 85 52% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 77,702 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	29.4% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion P6657 MD99256

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)