Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-A (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '18 at 18:54
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 200 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 669 67% 543 Pts	64-Core 859 53% 859 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 3354) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Lighting 38 Reflection 26.2 Parallax 32.5 31% 32.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 33 28% 35 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 136 134 139 141 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 387 Write 150 Mixed 187 SusWrite 138 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 21.1 87% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 45.4 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 42.7 33% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 85%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 4GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 34 35 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 50.2 Mixed 40 SusWrite 34.8 33% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 158% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 35%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 35 Write 21.3 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 17.4 26% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.4 106% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47 29,751 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 31.3 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 27.5 76% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	58x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	48x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	44x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	34x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	21x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 84%, 17,710 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $484

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16