MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '18 at 16:53
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 99.8 59% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 206 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 550 8,236 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 22F2) 2GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 22.4 15% 24.2 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 15.6 Splatting 34.5 22% 26.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 375 394 349 351 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 460 Write 440 Mixed 328 SusWrite 372 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 25.7 104% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 351 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 347 254% 332 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 871GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 174 173 174 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 175 Mixed 111 SusWrite 174 118% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x4GB 8,035 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 20.5 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 27 SC Mixed 21.7 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 94.1 42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	365x
Core i5-6400Intel $78Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	178x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	154x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	241x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	237x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	150x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	60x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	49x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $272

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16