bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1176x885x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 14 '18 at 07:34
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 90.1
38% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 138
22% 156 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 86GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 235 155 220 151 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 65.5
Write 66.3
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 179
22% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 1.9
18% 7.47 MB/s
DQ Read 8.7
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 98.3
67% 78.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 17GB
12GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 24 77 39 23 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 13
Write 100
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 40.2
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1.2
304% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback