HP Carver 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Carver 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 194
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 373
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 32.6
37% 39.6 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 38.6
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 117 84 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 251
Write 219
Mixed 193
SusWrite 115
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 10.5
64% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 17.2
44% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 99%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
482GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 253 253 259 261 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 206
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 256
139% 191 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 138%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 KHX1600C9D3/4GX Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Carver 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP Carver 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback