Acer TravelMate P273

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer TravelMate P273  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA70_HC
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 21:19
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 81.8
36% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 150
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0688) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.61
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 85 109 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 233
Write 143
Mixed 140
SusWrite 100
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 19.6
67% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 140
107% 148 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 83%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
612GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 40 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29% Poor
Read 41.3
Write 41.8
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 40.6
52% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S16C11G SHI641GBCGC28ESBSD 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P273 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P273

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback