Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 19:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 155
69% 112 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 653
50% 449 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1681
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 73
Parallax 58.3
53% 65.4 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 63.5
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1140 407 310 310 309 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,663
Write 1,469
Mixed 853
SusWrite 463
248% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 69.1
231% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 890
DQ Mixed 935
700% 930 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 208%
Great: 280%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
621GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 67 84 77 77 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 14.2
Write 1.8
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 79.7
25% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.8
345% 2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 23.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback