Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141105
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '18 at 02:02
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$51 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 186 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 343 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.2 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 16.8 15% 17.1 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 16.8 16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA0102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 385 Write 354 Mixed 335 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 25.9 80% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 293 215% 283 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 107%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 338GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 88.2 Write 60.5 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 60.6 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 63%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 29GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 8.2 8.6 7.4 8.6 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 35.8 Write 13 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 7.1 19% 17 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 5.3 378% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	35.8% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	964x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	787x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	533x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	403x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	372x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	260x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	164x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	158x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16