Gigabyte GA-Z97N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140530
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 01:52
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 164
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 321
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.4% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 37.8
20% 30.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 36.8
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 128 77 60 97 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 412
Write 128
Mixed 307
SusWrite 114
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 31.4
122% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 199
172% 250 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73%
Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
111GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 151 129 130 143 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48% Average
Read 2.3
Write 425
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 164
39% 168 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 14.5
89% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 140
142% 226 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 48%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
524GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 140 140 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 135
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 141
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 35.7
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 35.4
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 59%
Generic USB2.0-CRW-Combo 4GB
1GB free, PID 0150
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 13
Mixed 6
SusWrite 14.9
16% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0118 8GBH2X04E99927-15 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97N-WIFI Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97N-WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback