MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 05:17
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 86.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 743
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 105
63% 85 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 57.5
53% 66 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg20zms512g NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ACDA0101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 807 814 814 828 727 661 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 785
Write 748
Mixed 729
SusWrite 775
171% 759 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.4
188% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 439
368% 546 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 164%
Great: 157%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
147GB free
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 474 180 152 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 466
Write 475
Mixed 396
SusWrite 262
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 39.8
146% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 231
174% 229 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 94%
Liteon CV3-8D256-41 SATA 256GB SED
88GB free
Firmware: T88410C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 237 231 238 238 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 457
Mixed 391
SusWrite 264
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 45.4
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 188
166% 251 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
782GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 101 108 98 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 88.8
Write 70.2
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 102
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55%
Great: 75%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
366GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 93 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 74.7
Write 51.5
Mixed 49
SusWrite 94.8
50% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 33.1
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 26.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $695
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback