HP PAVILION 23 All In One

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP PAVILION 23 All In One  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B45
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 19:00
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 280
40% 292 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 M360
HP(103C 2B45) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 24.20.13019.1008
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 9.83
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 13.6
8% 12 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 7.22
6% 7.24 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 126 154 160 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 158
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 147
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 12.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback