Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 LE (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110408
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '18 at 11:47
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 144 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 361 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 22.2 Parallax 28.2 18% 24.3 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 26.7 Splatting 23.6 22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ SOLID3 480GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 102 106 91 79 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.5% Poor	Read 178 Write 61.7 Mixed 101 SusWrite 87.6 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 8.1 35% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 75.9 DQ Write 38.4 DQ Mixed 29.2 29% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0739 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 18 18 17 19 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 30 Write 18.2 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 16.3 16% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.5 155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 87%
WD WD1600JB-00GVC0 160GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 108GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 51 51 52 52 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 50 Write 55 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 51.5 34% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 32%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 1,524 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 16 17 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 24.7 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 16.9 31% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 74%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 182 180 180 184 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 140 Write 161 Mixed 100 SusWrite 180 200% 145 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-437.A01LF 2x4GB 703 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	310x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	230x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	86x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	72x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16