PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180516 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 09 '18 at 16:33 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
49.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 291 275 281 238 121 MB/s
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD7500AACS-65D6B 750GB
136GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 59 60 59 59 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
79GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 130 132 122 125 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.7%
Very good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 6,654x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 3,686x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 1,048x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2,174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1,385x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1,255x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $744 |