Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 16:59
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 659
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 55.6
31% 49.2 fps
MRender 57.2
Gravity 40.5
Splatting 48
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 34%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,428
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,266
379% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 74.7
249% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 878
632% 816 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
89GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 20 25 15 17 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 100
Write 113
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 20.8
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
506GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 55.9
Write 57.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 57.7
67% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 50%
ST975042 2AS 750GB
646GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 49 60 47 49 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 28.9
Mixed 21
SusWrite 50.8
45% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback