ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro SYS-2028TP-HC0R-SIOM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Supermicro SYS-2028TP-HC0R-SIOM (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10DRT-PS
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20181006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '18 at 09:47
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4 1,389 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 181 59% 109 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 593 56% 464 Pts	64-Core 1,575 98% 1,575 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 999GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 885GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 101 101 104 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 136 Write 131 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 100 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.9 236% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 4x16GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54% Above average	MC Read 30 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback