Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory8.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 00:57
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 149
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 435
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 526
32% 526 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.6% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 61.7
44% 56.2 fps
MRender 53.1
Gravity 48
Splatting 40.3
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 158 153 153 152 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 365
Write 358
Mixed 302
SusWrite 177
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 40.9
134% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 247
187% 251 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 115%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
317GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 64 65 68 67 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 49.4
Write 80.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 63.2
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 68%
WD WD30EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 66 63 47 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 57.6
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 56.5
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL25664FN1608.16FG Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG BL25664FN1608.16FG BL25664FN1608.16FG 10GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback