Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 00:07
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 668
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 679
42% 679 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1481) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6195
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 24.3
Parallax 7.81
6% 13.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 15.6
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 401 286 153 154 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71% Very good
Read 408
Write 366
Mixed 343
SusWrite 251
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 26.9
88% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 301
216% 276 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 131 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 131
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.4% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 14.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback