Shuttle SX58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemShuttle SX58  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle SX58
Memory6.4 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 20:01
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 95.6
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 139
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 397
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 80.8
56% 78.3 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 78.1
63% 76.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 20 17 16 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 17.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 20.2
14% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 RMB2GB484CA5-13HC Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG 41GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SX58 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Shuttle SX58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback