Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 05 '18 at 20:56
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 512
69% 513 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 54.3
36% 43.4 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 38.7
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 111 116 124 122 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.4% Good
Read 132
Write 192
Mixed 171
SusWrite 121
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 33
140% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 153
123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 91%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
210GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 106
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.6% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.4
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback