HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 831D
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '18 at 18:23
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 110
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 115
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 520
HP(103C 831D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 7.81
4% 6.64 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.57
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 109 62 74 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 363
Write 268
Mixed 259
SusWrite 98.4
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 10.5
38% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 60.1
DQ Mixed 42.2
44% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 92 92 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 97.2
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 92.8
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4S7S8MB-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-bs0xx Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback